A Third of Dinos May Be Oh-no's!

"A Third of Dinos May be Oh-no's," Associated Press, Denver Post, Sun 11/8/09, p7B

Thanks Matt, for the source.

Evo's say the Ark couldn't hold enough animals, especially dino's. They say 1500 species existed. But Noah didn't need two of each species -- just two of each Genesis Kind. Famed Montana evo Jack Horner (portrayed in "Jurassic Park") now says, "up to a third of dinosaur species identified by humans never existed. Some dinosaurs were incorrectly classified as unique species when they represent juveniles of already known species." See how evo-think causes science mistakes! Horner says, "People have the tendency to look at the difference between things rather than the similarities." That's 'cuz Darwin teaches that one bacterium "evolved"differences and it became -- everything!The Bible groups creatures by similarities and by reproduction. If evo's hadda followed the Bible, instead, they'da got it right the first time!
Keep thinking! Dr J.

Neanders & Ice Age

You talked about the Neanderthals having big noses due to the Ice Age. If the Ice Age occurred, when was it and is there any Biblical reference? Thanks,Your brother in Him, Eric at SE MO State U



Eric, the Ice Age didn't "give" Neanders those noses -- they just had them -- which worked out pretty good for them during the Ice Age. The Bible doesn't mention the Ice Age. All the folks in the Bible histories, lived in the Middle East. If an Ice Age happened today, Palentinians would never know it, unless they watched it on CNN. Ice Age cold never got close enough to the equator to be noticed. Probablythe Flood triggered global cooling in the century following it, an effect lasting only 300-500 yrs. DrJ

"Ardi" Human-Link - Not!

Team leader Prof. Tim White head of the Human Evolution Research Center at UCal-Berkeley "new" Ardipithecus ramidus "missing link" fossil "We can't say this species was a direct ancestor of modern humans, so we have to be careful." Yet Owen Lovejoy chair of Anthropology at Kent State boldly says, "We're going to have to rewrite the textbooks."(USA Today) But why? Dr. White says, Ardi's species could be the ancestor of Lucy, which could be the ancestor of humans ... Without additional fossil evidence, however, connecting the individual or dots is hazardous. (UCB news release 10/1/09 Lovejoy persists, this reverses the common wisdom of human origins. White boldly contradicts, “This is not that common ancestor but it’s the closest we have ever been able to come.”

Let's do a little "background check" on "Ardi." In 1992 the Ardipithecus ramidus tooth started the story. Like usual with all evo-finds headlines said they'd found yet another"missing link" triumph for the evo-story. Also like usual ... very soon after that ... her "link" status was quietly withdrawn. But now, all anybody remembers was the"triumph" part! Now, 17 years later, as though it's a "brand new fossil" evo's have hauled more new bones of the same monkey ... back into the headlines as "the real"link, calling it "Ardi" instead of A. ramidus, and then totally re-doing their evo-story to make to make it all fit together nicely. This is such propaganda!


http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/discoveries/2009-10-01-human-chimp-fossil_N.htm
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/10/01_ardiskeleton.shtml

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/science/02fossil.html_r=1&pagewanted=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33110809/ns/technology_and_science-science/from/ET
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/10/01/oldest.human.skeleton/index.htmleref=igoogle_cnn
Thanks John B, Pastor Brian, Drew, Rhodes, Ryan, and Bonnie J for the sources.




And hey ... there's a chance I'll get to debate with an evo-prof on the radio in MD tomorrow ... about "Ardi." Pray this comes through! I'll give y'all the web address so you can listen live or listen later. God bless you all. And ... keep thinking !! Dr J